all 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [S] 61 points 14 hours ago (1 child)
  • [–] [S] 36 points 14 hours ago* (1 child)

    seems like it. there is no source on nasa web, it just circulates on facebook/instagram/twitter.

    nasa gallery from juno (aircraft orbiting jupiter): https://science.nasa.gov/gallery/junocam-images/

    collapsed inline media

    https://hostux.pics/images/2026/08/03/Screenshot-from-2026-08-03-08-20-398ce2259aa066ea37.png

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 40 points 14 hours ago

    Don't bring AI slop to lemmy

  • source
  • [–] [S] 10 points 13 hours ago
    [–] [S] 24 points 16 hours ago* (1 child)

    NASA: heavily edits a grainy drab picture to make it look like a Van Gogh painting

    Internet: Van Gogh must have had telescopic 2nd sight.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 9 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

    could you link the original image?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 34 points 14 hours ago

    It's AI slop. I tried to find it and only references to images like this are from Facebook, Instagram and Threads. No hits in any of the NASA or Juno archives. The real photos of Jupiter are amazing, but don't look anything like this.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 21 points 15 hours ago (1 child)

    I could find this particular one, but you can see examples like https://images.nasa.gov/details/PIA23609, https://images.nasa.gov/details/PIA25693, and https://images.nasa.gov/details/PIA25017 to see what the pictures actually look like. While Jupiter's storms seen from space do have a certain Van Gogh feeling, the one on this post has saturation and contrast dialled up to 11.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] [S] 4 points 12 hours ago

    No, NASA didn't.

  • source